Screwcharged Compression Target

Discussion in 'PSI Superchargers Tech Questions' started by TOL, Oct 22, 2010.

  1. TOL

    TOL Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,352
    Likes Received:
    18
    There seems to be a few schools of thought regarding what static compression to run in a serious screw compressed meth application (D or C). Obviously a lot of factors come into play, not the least of which are the cam/head designs.

    What are some of the modern funny car and outlaw promod screw engines running these days for static compression? I've been given recommendations as low as 10:1 and as high as over 12:1. Is there a better dynamic measure to use?

    Curious as to any thoughts or feedback.

    Thanks.
     
    #1
  2. aj481x

    aj481x Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    18
    (boost psi / 14.7) + 1) x motor compression = effective compression. Look for a number between 45 and 50.
     
    #2
  3. sean70ss

    sean70ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    2
    comp

    Also depends on the cylinder head your using as well.
     
    #3
  4. TOL

    TOL Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,352
    Likes Received:
    18
    Agreed, as a rough rule of thumb. However "Boost" is an arbitrary quantity and it is a function of a lot of variables.

    To my way of thinking, the dynamic compression ratio (the trapping ratio which exists after IVC) would be of more relevance for tuning. Has anyone explored screw meth with in cylinder pressure sensing? That's the direction I am headed in, but would like to talk to others who may have already been there.

    Thanks, and please PM if not wanting to discuss in public.
     
    #4
  5. rb0804

    rb0804 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    38
    what happens if you exceed the recommended number of 50?
     
    #5
  6. aj481x

    aj481x Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    18
    You lose performance because you have to run it too rich or too retarded to not hurt parts.
     
    #6
  7. rb0804

    rb0804 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    38
    I would think that your cam timing would come into play here and we would have to take a look at the dynamic compression ratio. If you are running a cam with minimal overlap and are trying to trap as much into the chamber as possible, you would have a problem. If you were running a more aggressive cam with more overlap, less of that incoming high pressure charge will be trapped in the chamber because more of it is blowing out the exhaust. I would think that this would help to cool things down a bit to a manageable temp, but I don't know for sure, as I haven't tried it yet. It seems that is what the nitrous guys try to do with their high compression, large cams, but they don't run much for timing either. I would also be interested in hearing thoughts/data about cylinder pressure sensing.
     
    #7
  8. aj481x

    aj481x Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    18
    There are an infinite number of theoretical possibilities. ;)
     
    #8
  9. AFC357

    AFC357 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    986
    Likes Received:
    0
    And it depends on your budget!
     
    #9
  10. rb0804

    rb0804 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    38
    so your saying the 45-50 is in the safe zone for ALL applications?
     
    #10
  11. aj481x

    aj481x Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    18
    It was the answer to the original question.
     
    #11

Share This Page