Episode IV: The Blown Cars Strike Back

Discussion in 'Pit Buzz' started by Will Hanna, Apr 19, 2005.

  1. Will Hanna

    Will Hanna We put the 'inside' in Top Alcohol
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,706
    Likes Received:
    132
    Just when it looked like the 'Dark Side' of Top Alcohol was about to take over with back to back dominating performances, the fleeting 'Rebellion' of blown cars struck back with a dominating performance in the battle of 'The Strip' in Las Vegas....

    Ok, for real with no Star Wars play on words, the tide really turned in Las Vegas. Two words: Heat and Altitude pretty much knocked the A/Fuelers in the dirt.

    With both of those factors, which was the most debilitating? The heat or the altitude? A relative lack of runs under 98% doesn't help either. (I say relative in the fact compared to years of runs at 100%).

    We could see this class polarize if nothing is done soon. Nearly all blown car fields this summer and Nearly all A/Fuel fields when it's cool. Oh yeah, we did see that in Houston - only 2 blown cars.

    Personally, I think Vegas makes the case all but stronger for altitude factoring of nitro. I didn't get any replies after I asked A/Fuel racers after Gainesville if they would trade 1% when it's cool (97%) for 1% when it's hot (99%). Any takers now? I'm not trying to be a smart ass here, just making the point if you want to level the playing field out, it may take altitude factoring of tracks. High alt tracks, the A/Fuelers get more, sea level, they get less.

    If it gets cooler than 65 degrees, they have to have the chutes out by 800'. Ok, just joking. :D

    Up next on tap: Atlanta in a few weeks. A track that has the nickname 'Hotlanta.' Track alt 1100 ft. Not extreme, not exactly sea level. Then Topeka.

    Don't touch that dial....
     
    #1
  2. nitrohawk

    nitrohawk New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Will I think it is quite obvious that you will not see injected cars running much in the summer.
    It seems the difference in performance is much greater for the fuel cars when running at higher alt. thatn for the blown cars running at lower alt. I'm sure NHRA is getting an ear full from some of the a-fuel teams. Ashley runs all the nationals and her daddy will do what ever it takes to see that the field is leveled. As I have said before this is a real problem and I am sure NHRA is about fed up with addressing and readdressing it. Just a question? Why keep juggeling the rules and fuel % on the fuel cars.
    When the temp gets up and the alt. is above 3000' take some blower od away from the blown cars. This would be more to NHRA's liking as it would slow the whole class down for about 1/2 the races.
    Before the blown cars get to excited about this because it would cause them to have to adjust their tuneup think about what happens every time the % is changed on an a-fuel car. Just food for thought as I don't think there is any easy solutions to fix this problem in every situation.
    At Vegas the fuel cars would have been hard pressed to run as good as the blown cars with 100 percent.
     
    #2
  3. Will Hanna

    Will Hanna We put the 'inside' in Top Alcohol
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,706
    Likes Received:
    132
    since i've been 'bi-fuel' and been on both sides of the fence, there's a lot more to change on a blown car to compensate for less o/d than what the top a/fuel teams changed for 98%. many of them changed little if nothing at all. reichert runs 5.18 third run on 98, gallant hits a 28 first run......

    i think there's enough mineshafts in the year (2-3) to balance the few extreme alt races where even 100% won't help (denver, fallon, acton)

    if you knock the o/d down, all we have to do is look at tafc. you got to redo your fuel system, new gear ratios. yeah i'm sure nhra wants to keep performance down, but more than that, they want to keep oil downs down, and the increased rpm's that would come with less od .....

    here's a simple solution to the alt problem for the a/fuelers.....the dim bulb in my head just went off...

    if a div has a race over 'X' altitude like the above mentioned tracks, let an a/fuel racer use an out of div towards in div. maybe make it a specified event. such as in div 5, a/fuelers can sub noble or memphis for denver. div 6 can sub sonoma for acton, div 7 can sub medford for fallon....

    food for thought....
     
    #3
  4. Woodchip

    Woodchip Top Alcohol Dragster

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me expand on your idea Will
    How about having regulation fuel tank and main fuel line sizes for all a/fuel cars. Everyone goes to the lanes with 100%. in the lanes tech adds a measured amount of methanol. A jug or two pre mix is set aside by NHRA in the staging area in case of shut offs. Assume all altitude factored races will have 100% so theres no wholesale changes to combinations. Other races are compensated at the head of staging for heat/corrected altitude.
     
    #4
  5. tjenna

    tjenna Top Alcohol

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Juat get rid of the a-fuel cars and call it good.

    It would nice if IHRA changed their top fuel to injected and we all could sort of be happy.
     
    #5
  6. bulldog6

    bulldog6 A/Fuel #4

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just get rid of the blown cars. The fans could still smell nitro and I wouldn't have to hear the blower cars warming up.
     
    #6
  7. G.Reichert

    G.Reichert New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    It wasnt the third pass it was the fourth pass at fifty some degrees with a correct alitude of 37 feet so you cant compare our run to the guys out west. Also look at last weekend at Indy what happened to the A/Fuel cars when it got hotter. We havent been out west yet and Im not looking forward to going out west because of the fact that the a/fuel cars arent going to run in hot weather or bad air. Also we'd appreciate it if you left us out of your conversations.
     
    #7
  8. Will Hanna

    Will Hanna We put the 'inside' in Top Alcohol
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,706
    Likes Received:
    132
    few points:

    woodchip - good idea in principle, not realisitic. there are too many different types of cars, and the mixture is too sensitive. tank location would be critical, etc. the mixture ratio really gets crazy too. if you're mixing the fuel and you're at 98.2%, and you put too much alcohol in, say like 1 oz and come up with 97.5%, it would take close to 30-40 oz of nitro to get the mixture back up to 98.0%.

    gloria - i'm taking up for the a/fuel guys here and getting shot at too! obviously you can't compare you're run with the west coast guys because they haven't had the conditions yall had. i'm just making the point that many of the top teams early in the year didn't make many changes to the tune-up from 100% to 98. bob suggested reducing od for blown cars vs adjusting nitro. well, it's documented by the fc guys what has to be done to compensate for less od, that's not just what i think. it takes alot of money and alot of changes.

    basically i think the a/fuelers need some more nitro at altitude to compensate. when at sealevel, 97 may be more appropriate.

    ok, i'm waiting for someone to say if hillary ran that good in vegas....she would have ran 4.80's at 310 in gainesville.....

    i'm not trying to rock the boat here or keep division between the blown and a/fuel guys, i just want to see equal racing. i'm trying to throw realistic ideas out there.

    i always wear my flak vest, so fire away....
     
    #8
  9. tjenna

    tjenna Top Alcohol

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmmm... What are internet message boards... supposed to talk about.

    Lets not talk about the racers... lets talk about the pets and the fans that go to the races.
     
    #9
  10. dmwells

    dmwells New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why don't all the drivers & owners get together and sign a petition to run 8 a-fuel cars and 8- blown cars at national events. 4&4 at dvivsional, then we have blown against blown and a-fuel against a-fuel. Then you can only complain about your own counterpart. I know this has been brought up before by myself and others,but never
    brought to NHRA in this format of a petition.
    just my 2cents. Dave
     
    #10
  11. Doug Watt

    Doug Watt AFD

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why don't all the drivers & owners get together and sign a petition to run 8 a-fuel cars and 8- blown cars at national events. 4&4 at dvivsional, then we have blown against blown and a-fuel against a-fuel. Then you can only complain about your own counterpart.

    This is the only solution! All others are not going to work.
     
    #11
  12. Will Hanna

    Will Hanna We put the 'inside' in Top Alcohol
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,706
    Likes Received:
    132
    david and doug.

    that's the only solution to mixing apples and oranges is put them in seperate bags, but i just don't see nhra doing that. they're going to make 'fruit salad.'

    ok, if they did seperate the fields, what about payouts? does each winner split the 'big' $5k check? contingency split?

    let's face it, as alcohol racers we're entertainers. most of us don't pay entry fees, and nhra pay's each class $33,600 a race for a 16 car show. a/fuel vs. blown has entertainment value. it's part of what makes the class interesting. fans root for one side or the other. fans rooting is why they pay $50 on sunday to come watch the big show.

    i've said it once and i'll say it again, i think we need to take the rivalry one step further. i think as racers we all need to have an inside agreement - whatever is said in a tv interview - don't take it personal. so when a blown driver gets a tv interview, instead of 'yes i'd like to thank sponsor a, b &c, and the guys did a great job...' talk some smack about the a/fuelers. A/fuelers, talk some smack about the blown cars. remember how much attention cannon and force got when cannon first came on the scene? they knew the deal behind the scenes, but made a big deal out of it on tv. i mean this doesn't have to turn into wwe wrestling, but a little rivalry doesn't hurt.

    keep the idea's coming. the decision makers do tune in here.
     
    #12
  13. Doug Watt

    Doug Watt AFD

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Will,

    Even if we had 100% in Vegas there's no way any Afueler would have run a 5.40 at 4300 ft corrected and at 37ft corrected there's no way a Blown Alky car is going to run a 5.18.

    I have allways like the rivalery between the 2 types in TAD but this isn't going to work anymore. If NHRA would have left it alone one more year it would have taken care of itself... Nitro for the dragsters and Alky for the funny cars.

    Just another opinion...
    Doug
     
    #13
  14. dmwells

    dmwells New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have been talking to some the upper people and one of the things they are afraid of is we don't all agree, second they think this would lower car counts, I don't agree I think it would increase car counts. Third they don't want to make any quick decisions that would destroy the class,so if we can all agree on what ot do then they will listen. Then there is the point about money it would increase slightly but someone should do the math it probably isn't as much as you think as we are talking half the cars on each side. the big question is do we all agree or not? If we don't then there is no sense in pursuing it. Is there something else I don't see here ? If there is lets hear it. Dave
     
    #14
  15. dmwells

    dmwells New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok here is the math if I have the correct amounts.
    today national total for 16 cars is $33,200
    if we do 8x8total is $39,200
    In div 5 for 8 cars is $7950
    If we did 4x4 it would be $11,100

    how I did it was just drop the bottom pay out for 8 cars national 4 cars div with current pay outs.
    does not include like indy etc. that have higher payouts
    Dave
     
    #15
  16. nitrohawk

    nitrohawk New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well what is going to happen here in the real world is that NHRA is going to do nothing probably for the whole year and they take a look at the problem next year. This season will revert to blown cars mostly durning the summer and fuel cars in the spring and fall with a few exceptions thrown in like Chicago, English Town, etc. The world champion will not be desided by who runs the most nationals but who picks their races the best. It will also mean that you will have to do a whole lot of traveling to get the races in where your car preforms best. This means an even greater advantage to the teams with the most money. At the end of the year NHRA depending on the out come will make another rule change on the fuel cars, but what is new. Look at the past. How many rule changes have the fuel cars had to deal with in the last five years? Just like taking od from the blown cars at higher elevations requires changes so to the weight rule last year required most fuel teams to come up with a whole new engine cid combination or add 100-150 lbs of unsafe weight to the cars. It is much easier to count blower pulley teeth than to police changes in nitro. Jeff Wilson was not afraid to compete in good air and although he did not win in the two races at Houston he was still there in the last round and had a very good chance of winning.
    My hat is off to Jeff. He was the only blown car at the Houston divisional and one of two at the nationals there. The good blown cars can compete at any race this year some better than others. The fuel cars can't. There will never be parity as long as one type of car has a blower to compensate for thin air. It would be nice if there was enough car count that we could have two 16 car fields aat the nationals but I don't see that happening. Unless, Lucas can make it happen.
     
    #16
  17. Darren Smith

    Darren Smith New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seems to me the TAD's used to get over 25 cars at every race. They don't get that anymore, seems the car counts are dropping by themselves. I agree with Will, a Weather factor for the A-fuel Dragsters would work, but I doubt you'd get all the Drivers to agree on what % to run at what track/temp.
     
    #17
  18. G.Reichert

    G.Reichert New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doug at gainesville on 3/18/05 time 5pm altitude 125 hum 48% temp 55 density altitude 28 run 5.18 at 276.7 Sunday at 9.41 zero altitude hum38 temp 67 density alt 709 run 5.21 at 271 so as temp and density alt go up the runs slow down. the 5.21 was our third run the second run was at 7pm alt at 50 hum at 29% temp 67 density at 720 and it went a 5.34 at 267. It actually warmed up that night so the density alt went way up and the car slowed down so temp plays a big factor and so does alt.
     
    #18
  19. The Zone

    The Zone Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    1
    Doug Watt
    last year vegas second session divisional 73 degrees, relative humidity 34 percent, barometer 27.70 inches, adjusted altitude 3,702 feet,
    B. Riechert goes 5.36/271.52
    Myers goes 5.423/261.02,
    Greg Tacke goes 5.44

    Final session 68 degrees, relative humidity 35 percent, barometer 26.62 inches, adjusted altitude 4,682 feet
    Reichert goes 5.342/272.28
    Mitch Myers Runs 5.324/272.67,
    Robert Perkins Runs 5.438/258.57

    What were you saying??? ;) [​IMG]

    Dean
     
    #19
  20. Darren Smith

    Darren Smith New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't see NHRA ever allowing 99% at one track, 97% at another. They won't want to bother with it.
     
    #20

Share This Page